Activiteit

This paper presents a view of the current sources of potential conflicts in the academic discipline of nursing. It suggests that these conflicts could lead, in the Kuhnian sense, to a paradigm war. The differing paradigms underlying the education and traditions of the PhD prepared nurse scientist/researcher/scholar and the DNP prepared nurse practitioner are a challenge for the discipline. DNP programs are swelling and faculty are needed to teach in these programs, and their position with regard to the usual rank and tenure structures of academe are not yet clear. Concern arises when the tenured PhD nurse scientist faculty numbers drop as the DNP faculty numbers increase. The body of nursing science is threatened as fewer students enter PhD programs and faculty retire. The DNP faculty paradigm does not provide for the rigor and preparation need to carry forward the disciplinary scientific knowledge mission. Rather than a fruitless war between the two paradigms, ways are suggested to fully embrace the differences as important to nursing, and to increase the number of PhD prepared nurse scientists. BACKGROUND Inclusivity, the intentional incorporation of practices that foster a sense of belonging by promoting meaningful interactions among persons and groups representing different traits, perceptions and experiences, is a prerequisite for excellence in nursing education. Nevertheless, many faculty struggle to create an inclusive learning experience for baccalaureate nursing students. PURPOSE The purpose of this scoping study was to explore and summarize the extant literature on inclusivity, identify evidence-based strategies to promote inclusivity, and provide directions for further research on inclusivity in baccalaureate nursing education. RESULTS Thirty studies, conducted in English-speaking countries, from 2001 through 2016, were included in the final analysis. Results from the mostly descriptive studies were organized into 3 themes. 1) Nursing students from underrepresented minority groups experience discrimination from peers, faculty, and clinicians in the classroom, the clinical setting and/or the larger institution. 2) The cumulative effect of discrimination is a lack of belongingness, which is associated with adverse outcomes. 3) All aspects of the undergraduate nursing students’ learning community act as facilitators or barriers to inclusivity or a sense of belongingness. CONCLUSIONS This study provided a deeper understanding of underrepresented minority nursing students’ experiences and perspectives related to inclusivity. This, in turn, can inform future action. Compassionate, competent, and holistic care is at the core of palliative care nursing. Knowledge of primary palliative care concepts is a fundamental expectation of graduating nursing students. The release of updated national educational competencies in palliative care coupled with a new palliative care curriculum for prelicensure nursing students created a need to measure acquisition of new knowledge. The purpose of this paper is to describe development and psychometric evaluation of a new palliative care measure. Development of the new measure was guided by an expert team of palliative care educators, incorporating existing knowledge measures as well as content from the newly developed curriculum. A 4-step process resulted in development of a 27-item measure reflecting the 17 new core competencies for undergraduate palliative care education. Initial pilot testing in a sample of 262 nursing students demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.70), with a 2-factor model that aligns with multiple national expectations for primary palliative care. This study is the first to align knowledge items with national palliative care competencies and care domains. Further psychometric testing will be conducted as well as large multisite research collaborations to test curriculum implementation and use this knowledge measure in prelicensure nursing education. The curricula of undergraduate nursing programs lack education in palliative and end-of-life care. If the topic is covered, it is generally within isolated lectures and rarely as a full course. With the growing demand for nursing competence in palliative care, curricula must adapt to also place emphasis on this important topic. The release in 2016 of the American Association of College of Nursing (AACN) Palliative Competencies and Recommendations for Educating Undergraduate Nursing Students (CARES) drew attention to the need for expanded undergraduate education on this topic. This paper describes the development and delivery of an undergraduate-level online nursing elective course in palliative and end-of-life care offered through a large public university. Innovative elements of the course include practicing difficult conversations using technology to enable active student engagement in an online environment, a serious game involving individual role play for treatment decision making, and special topic weeks allowing a deeper dive into seldom discussed populations such as the homeless, which the students described as playing an important role in contributing to their learning. LOXO-101 BACKGROUND Developing the next generation of nurse researchers must be a priority to advance the discipline’s science. A comprehensive description of the current federally-funded research is useful for understanding the research enterprise in Schools of Nursing. PURPOSE To describe the past 5 years of National Institute of Health (NIH) funding patterns in US Schools of Nursing. METHOD Data were extracted from NIH RePORTER for years 2014-2018. The total number of award types (F, K, R, U, P and T) granted to a School of Nursing in the US was summarized and organized by Institute. Grants were then characterized according to whether the Principal Investigator had a nursing degree (yes or no). Finally, the total funding from each NIH Institute/Center that was awarded to a School of Nursing was assessed. FINDINGS Nearly 50% of the National Institute of Nursing Research’s (NINR) extramural budget is awarded through grants to Schools of Nursing in the US. NINR funds 80% of training grants and >70% of Center grants, which support the education and infrastructure for research, respectively, at Schools of Nursing.