-
Hwang Bowling heeft een update geplaatst 1 week, 2 dagen geleden
izing these patients, followed by ST15 (26%, 19 of 74). learn more CONCLUSIONS The colonization of K pneumoniae may increase the incidence of corresponding K pneumoniae infection in critically ill patients in the ICU. High prevalence of ST11 CRKP (due to blaKPC-2) carriage and infection in ICU was observed. © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.BACKGROUND Candidemia is the most common, serious fungal infection and Candida antifungal resistance is a challenge. We report recent surveillance of candidemia in China. METHODS The study encompassed 77 Chinese hospitals over 3 years. Identification of Candida species was by mass spectrometry and DNA sequencing. Antifungal susceptibility was determined using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method. RESULTS In total, 4010 isolates were collected from candidemia patients. Although C. albicans was the most common species, non-albicans Candida species accounted for over two-thirds of isolates, predominated C. parapsilosis complex (27.1%), C. tropicalis (18.7%), and C. glabrata complex (12.0%). Most C. albicans and C. parapsilosis complex isolates were susceptible to all antifungal agents (resistance rate 56% of C. haemulonii isolates were multidrug resistance. CONCLUSIONS Non-albicans Candida species are the predominant cause of candidemia in China. Azole resistance is notable amongst C. tropicalis and C. glabrata. Coresistance and multidrug resistance has emerged in less common Candida species. © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.BACKGROUND An antimicrobial stewardship campaign was launched in 2011 by the Ministry of Health. This study aimed to assess the achievements and trends in the clinical use of antibiotics in secondary and tertiary hospitals following this campaign in China. METHODS This observational study analyzed nationwide hospital antibiotic procurement and consumption data and antibiotic-resistance surveillance data based on claims filed in 2010-2016. RESULTS After a 6-year national campaign, the proportion of outpatients and surgical patients who received antibiotic treatment decreased from 19.5% to 8.5% and from 97.9% to 38.3%, respectively. The intensity of antibiotic use among inpatients decreased from 85.3±29.8 defined daily dosage (DDD) per 100 patient days to 48.5±8.0 DDD per 100 patient days. Moreover, the antibiotic procurement expenditure among hospitals declined from 22.3% of total drug procurement costs in 2010 to 12.1% in 2016, although total drug procurement costs doubled during that time. The incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates also dropped (from 54.4% in 2010 to 34.4% in 2016), as did the proportion of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (from 30.8% to 22.3%). CONCLUSIONS The 6-year campaign successfully reduced antibiotic consumption and irrational drug use in Chinese hospitals which was associated with declines in the prevalence of common antibiotic-resistant bacteria. © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.BACKGROUND This study was performed to explore the apparent volume of distribution (Vd) of imipenem in patients with sepsis or septic shock. METHODS A prospective, observational, single-center study was conducted in patients with sepsis or septic shock. The patients were treated with 1 g of imipenem mixed with 200 mL of normal saline infused intravenously over a 3-hour period at 8-hour intervals. The concentration of imipenem was 5 mg/mL, and the rate of infusion was 5.5 mg/min. Blood samples for measuring imipenem serum concentrations with high-performance liquid chromatography were obtained before and at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 5 hours after drug infusion on study days 1 and 3. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated according to a noncompartment model. RESULTS A total of 25 adult patients were enrolled in this study, of whom 15 were diagnosed with sepsis and 10 with septic shock. The initial Vd (Vc) of imipenem was significantly lower in the sepsis than that in the septic shock group (mean [standard deviation],@oup.com.BACKGROUND Smooth and rough colony morphotypes of Mycobacterium abscessus are associated with virulence, but some isolates form both smooth and rough colonies, impeding successful morphotype identification. Reportedly, smooth/rough morphotypes are also related to the glycopeptidolipid (GPL) genotype. However, the accuracy of GPL genotyping to discriminate morphotypes and the relationship between GPL genotype and clinical characteristics of M abscessus lung disease have not been verified. METHODS A retrospective analysis of colony morphology, GPL genotype, and clinical data from 182 patients with M abscessus lung disease was conducted. RESULTS Of 194 clinical isolates, 126 (65.0%), 15 (7.7%), and 53 (27.3%) exhibited rough, smooth, and mixed colony morphotypes, respectively. Glycopeptidolipid genotyping indicated that 86.7% (13 of 15) of smooth isolates belonged to the GPL-wild type (WT) group, whereas 98.4% (124 of 126) of rough isolates belonged to the GPL-mutant type (MUT) group. Therefore, GPL genotyping accurately distinguished between smooth and rough morphotypes. Mixed colony morphotypes were also divided into GPL-WT (18.9%) and GPL-MUT (81.1%) groups. Further analysis revealed that patients infected with the GPL-MUT group presented with significantly worse baseline clinical characteristics and exacerbated episodes of lung disease. CONCLUSIONS Glycopeptidolipid genotyping accurately distinguishes smooth and rough colony morphotypes. Patients infected with the GPL-MUT genotype exhibit worse clinical characteristics and are at a higher risk of exacerbated lung disease. © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.