-
Christiansen Gauthier heeft een update geplaatst 2 weken, 4 dagen geleden
ss then 26), which was associated with economic cost-coping strategies. In those 14.9% of patients reporting severe financial toxicity (COST less then 14) there was also an increased risk of medication non-compliance, which may lead to worse health outcomes in this group.
This study aims to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and related restrictions on patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for ovarian cancer.
We retrospectively evaluated ovarian cancer patients who underwent HIPEC following complete cytoreductive surgery performed during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in three different centers specializing in gynecological oncology. All patients who underwent cytoreduction plus HIPEC for a primary, interval, and recurrent surgery were evaluated. Primary outcomes was postoperative 30-day morbidity and mortality. The secondary outcome was infection of patient and/or related staff with COVID-19 during the perioperative or early postoperative period.
We performed a total of 35 HIPEC procedures during the pandemic 15 (42.9%) patients underwent primary/interval surgery, while 20 (57.1%) patients had recurrent disease. Grade 3-4 complications occurred in one patient (2.9%) (chronic renal failure), while mortality did not occur in any patient. Neither the patients nor related staff were infected with the coronavirus during the perioperative or early postoperative period. One patient, who was diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia on postoperative day 80 died from the infection. Another patient died on postoperative day 85 due to progressive ovarian cancer, a disorder in vital functions, and organ failure.
HIPEC during the COVID-19 pandemic seems a safe and feasible procedure, with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. Careful selection of patients is important and precautions should be taken before the procedure.
HIPEC during the COVID-19 pandemic seems a safe and feasible procedure, with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. Careful selection of patients is important and precautions should be taken before the procedure.
In this study we investigated response rates of bevacizumab in addition to weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in neoadjuvant setting in cervical cancer stage IB-IIB.
In this retrospective study we included patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB-IIB cervical cancer. Treatment consisted of 9 weeks’ neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin (paclitaxel 60 mg/m
, carboplatin AUC 2.7; both weekly) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks). The radiologic response rate was analyzed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 criteria. The definition of optimal pathological response was complete disappearance of tumor (complete response, pCR) or residual disease with less than 3 mm stromal invasion (pPR1). selleck chemicals llc Suboptimal pathologic response (pPR2) was defined as persistent residual disease with more than 3 mm stromal invasion.
A total of 30 patients were included. Six patients had FIGO 2018 stage IB1-IB2 (20%), one had stage IB3 (3%), five had stage IIA (17%), and 18 had stage IIB (60%). After complcizumab in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting.
Bevacizumab in addition to weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin showed a 100% radiological RECIST response and an optimal pathological response of 38%. Although bevacizumab has an established role in the treatment of recurrent cervical cancer in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin, we did not observe a tendency toward superior effect on the pathological response rate of bevacizumab in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting.
In 2016 universal screening with mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry in all newly diagnosed endometrial carcinomas was introduced in Western Australia.
To compare the prevalence of Lynch syndrome associated endometrial carcinomas between 2016 and 2019 with a historical control (2015). Additionally, to compare the number of cases appropriately referred for genetic assessment.
A cross-sectional study of cases presented at the Western Australia gynecologic oncology tumor board was carried out. The primary outcome was the prevalence of Lynch syndrome associated endometrial carcinomas. A secondary outcome was the number of cases appropriately referred for genetic assessment. The following variables were extracted date of birth; age at diagnosis; vital status; tumor mismatch repair protein expression status (retained or lost) and if lost, the specific mismatch repair protein deficiency; patients who were referred to a genetic clinic; and family history, if recorded. Data were collected from the clini p=0.02). No cases of Lynch syndrome were diagnosed in patients aged over 70 years.
Universal immunohistochemical screening did not increase the proportion of Lynch syndrome associated endometrial carcinomas identified, although the study was underpowered to detect small differences. There was an improvement in appropriate referrals for genetic assessment.
Universal immunohistochemical screening did not increase the proportion of Lynch syndrome associated endometrial carcinomas identified, although the study was underpowered to detect small differences. There was an improvement in appropriate referrals for genetic assessment.
The objective of this study was to determine whether the implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is associated with earlier return to intended oncology treatment following interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced gynecologic cancers.
Participants comprised consecutive patients (n=278) with a preoperative diagnosis of stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer, divided into those that received treatment before versus after implementation of an ERAS protocol at our institution. All patients received at least three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a platinum based regimen and underwent interval cytoreduction via laparotomy with the intent to deliver additional cycles of chemotherapy postoperatively. The primary outcome was defined as the timely return to intended oncologic treatment, defined as the percentage of patients initiating adjuvant chemotherapy within 28 days postoperatively.
The study cohorts included 150 pre-ERAS patients and 128 post-ERAS patients. Median age was 65 years (range 58-71).